The following report was found on a USB stick in a briefcase abandoned at Tullamarine airport. (Secret TERFs are everywhere.) We are unable to vouch for the document’s authenticity but have reproduced it in full below.
***** PRISM: Prioritising the Rights of Incel Sissy Men *****
PRISM CORRECTNESS COLLECTIVE FIELD AGENT REPORT
23 January 2025
Chaser Boy Chas Liccardello (hereinafter ‘The Penitent’) was first identified as a transphobe in 2011, due to an episode of The Hamster Wheel, in which he commented, speaking of New Zealand-born Channel Ten breakfast program host Paul Henry, that he (Henry) was ‘so on the nose in New Zealand that when he ran for Parliament representing the right wing National Party in a safe, rural, conservative seat, he lost to a transsexual’.
The Penitent has, accordingly, been subject to monitoring and re-education since that time.
In November 2024, the Collective considered that his degree of repentance should be put to the test. Accordingly, we arranged for him to be given principal carriage of a segment of Planet America’s Fireside Chat dealing with Nancy Mace, transphobic South Carolina Congresswoman (hereinafter The Bigot), and her efforts to prevent Sarah McBride, newly-elected transgender representative for Delaware (hereinafter Our Heroine), from using the women’s bathrooms at the Capitol. (We considered there was a fine appropriateness in this choice of topic, as it would give The Penitent an opportunity to demonstrate how his attitude to transgender elected representatives had changed, under re-education, since 2011.)
However, to avoid any potential mishaps, we briefed and gave guidance to co-host John Barron, a steady and reliable PRISM sleeper agent (hereinafter The Ally), as to the role he was to play in the exercise.
On review, we find that The Penitent has progressed considerably in his adherence to doctrine but still lacks a thorough commitment and understanding. According, he remains subject to continued scrutiny and will be referred for further re-education.
We have assessed The Penitent against the following criteria:
• Reputational damage to The Bigot
• Praise for Our Heroine
Reputational damage to The Bigot:
The segment offered a sterling opportunity to discredit The Bigot, and The Penitent made use of it to a certain degree. We note with approval that:
• he said of The Bigot that she ‘did not deserve the benefit of the doubt’ (the doubt being whether The Bigot would actually be disturbed by the presence of Our Heroine in the women’s toilet, as she ludicrously claimed)
• he rightly pointed out that The Bigot was ‘a lot more interested in self-promotion’ and ‘was not arguing in good faith’
• he correctly described The Bigot’s position as ‘crap’ and ‘hyperventilating’ – In this regard, it was particularly intrepid of him to claim (as a way of discrediting The Bigot’s preposterous assertion that she was fighting for ‘every little girl across this country’) that ‘this was about congressional bathrooms only: No little girls there!’ Unfortunately this brave manoeuvre was somewhat undermined by the Washington Post reporter Liz Goodwin later in the piece, as she – quite innocently – disclosed that the Capitol is open to visitors. However we consider that only a particularly ill-willed (and sharp-eared) TERF would have twigged that such visitors would likely include little girls; and in any case The Penitent’s performance here does not evince any lack of adherence to doctrine by him. If anything, quite the contrary, as the subtle use of misinformation has always been a dependable tactic employed by deft ABC allies committed to defeating bigots and putting transphobes in their place
• he used comments made by followers of The Bigot, rather than by The Bigot herself, to discredit The Bigot. This is a very reliable tactic, as seen most effectively here in Australia in the case of Beth Rep, and we commend The Penitent for his use of it.
We also note The Penitent’s use of the term ‘cisgender women’: naturally we prefer ‘bonus-holers’ and ‘uterus-havers’ as more accurate and concise, but we acknowledge the backward context he is operating in at the ABC, where such terms have yet to become generally employed. Indeed, even the anodyne term ‘cisgender’ is not used as often as it could and should be.
Nevertheless, we also note that The Penitent twice mentioned that The Bigot is a survivor of sexual assault. This was unnecessary and unhelpful. We also note his erroneous postulations that transgender rights ‘usually come in conflict with cisgender women’s rights’ and that ‘a lot of people’ are ‘worried’ about transgender women in athletics. In addition, we note his offensive assertion that ‘unisex bathrooms’ are the ‘usual solution’ for transgender women.
These statements of his are in stark and telling contrast with those of The Ally, who:
• uncompromisingly proclaimed ‘This.Is.Bigotry!’
• looked confidently forward to the eradication of women’s toilets altogether (‘I hope we live to see in the very near future a time when we have no gendered signs on doors …’) and
• adroitly used The Bigot’s (claimed) sexual assault to discredit her (‘She is – she said –suffering from PTSD. She can be irrational and fixated’).
We conclude that The Penitent has yet to attain the requisite standard in relation to the discrediting of transphobes.
Praise for Our Heroine:
The Penitent’s approach to Our Heroine was to suggest that she had never intended to use the women’s bathroom anyway (Mace ‘didn’t even have an opponent … she was pushing on an open door’). To this end:
• He pointed out that she ‘hadn’t even asked’ to use the women’s bathrooms at the Capitol, cleverly not pointing out that she had ample opportunity, once The Bigot launched her campaign, to publicly state her intentions in that regard.
• He unblushingly interpreted Our Heroine’s statement about ‘kindness’ to mean that she did not intend to use the women’s bathrooms (‘No resistance came from Sarah McBride’). This was a bold move, given that TERF transphobes have been somewhat too successful, in certain circles, in denouncing the instruction to ‘be kind’ as a dog-whistle indicating a directive to (in their parlance) submit to men.
• He repeated Our Heroine’s statement ‘I’m not here to fight about bathrooms. I’m here to fight for Delawareans and to bring down costs facing families’ and did not in any way allude to her noteworthy record in trans advocacy – which may have unhelpfully alerted transphobes to her fundamental agenda.
All of this may be taken as speaking to The Penitent’s efforts to redeem himself from his outrageous 2011 wrongdoing, but at the same time it reveals how far he has yet to go to achieve full correctness. The correct position here is that Our Heroine is fully entitled to use the women’s bathroom. This position, tellingly, The Penitent never enunciated.
His approach contrasts unfavourably with The Ally’s, who did not hesitate to draw comparisons between Our Heroine and the ‘first Black representatives that went into that building, 100+ years ago, the first openly gay representatives to go in there … You wouldn’t be allowed to say “No Blacks” on bathrooms. You’re not allowed to say “No gays”.’ The Ally also correctly prioritised Our Heroine’s feelings and value over The Bigot’s (‘Nancy Mace didn’t think about … how she made Sarah McBride feel’) – something which, again, The Penitent failed to do.
Worse still, The Penitent, in (apparently) seeking to build upon The Ally’s arguments, brought up The Bigot’s (alleged) difficulties as ‘the first woman in the Citadel. When she was training in the army’. This was a near disaster as it was likely to have prompted viewers to recall the antiquated and erroneous belief that bonus-holers have been the victims of what TERFs call patriarchal oppression, rather than leading viewers to a correct understanding of bonus-holers as the privileged subset of womanhood we know them to be.
When we examine the above in conjunction with the statements of The Penitent’s sprinkled throughout the segment – such as that he would ‘normally’ take the position that ‘it’s not really right for us to tell a sexual-assault survivor her personal fears aren’t valid’ and that ‘I acknowledge that these are complicated issues for some people’ – we can only conclude that The Penitent’s repentance is so far only partial.
PRISM Correctness is, accordingly, continuing to monitor The Penitent, and have referred him to the ABC’s ACON/AWEI relationship manager for ongoing re-education. Meanwhile, we consider it prudent to revert to the ABC’s tried and true practice of not reporting on trans issues. Accordingly, we have issued an edict prohibiting Planet America from discussing Transphobe Trump’s executive order provocatively entitled ‘Defending Women [sic] from Gender Ideology Extremism [sic]…’, as it would merely give oxygen to a measure many privileged bonus-holers are likely to find reasonable and welcome.
We the PRISM Correctness Collective did however authorise The Ally to describe it, in the 22 January episode, as ‘basically denying non-binary people exist’. A concise summary and all that ABC viewers need to know.
END OF PRISM CORRECTNESS COLLECTIVE FIELD AGENT REPORT
***** PRISM: Prioritising the Rights of Incel Sissy Men *****